Archive | Reviews

Review: Omnivore Blade Works Tomahawks

The tomahawk is a versatile tool. It is at home in the woods with a camper or on the belt of a soldier. Its uses are many. The typical tomahawk has changed very little over of the years. Tomahawks from Omnivore Blade Works (OBW) are far from typical tomahawks.

I was lucky to be part of a “pass around” that was orchestrated by OBW on the Usual Suspect Network. A few weeks ago a box arrived on my door step and, inside, I found a brand new, pristine Jackal model tomahawk and a rough but ready looking Recon model tomahawk. I set about playing with both of them immediately.

The Jackal

The Jackal is a smaller, trimmer, lighter tomahawk at just 14″ overall. It has a finer edge and excels at cutting as well as chopping. It featured a digital camo paint scheme and beautifully machined and finished natural color micarta handle slabs. The paint and handle materials can all be customized at the time of ordering.

One of the most distinctive features of the Jackal are the “teeth” on the pommel. They are reminiscent of the the teeth that you might find on the the tomahawk’s namesake. The Jackal also features a very blade like spike that comes to a very sharp point.

The Recon

The Recon tomahawk is a full size tomahawk at 18.5″ overall that has been stripped to its barest essentials. It is slim, light, and very fast. There are no handle slabs, only an aggressively skeletonized haft of steel that can be cord-wrapped if the user chooses. The name Recon speaks to its spartan style, light weight, and speed.

The rear of the Recon features an impressive spike that is designed for piercing strength and durability. The spike has a series of thick edges that will pierce readily without being fragile and prone to chipping and rolling. The Recon that was sent to me had been through OBW’s testing. It was beat up, ragged, worn, and rough looking but still just as functional as ever. Before it was sent to me it spent 2 weeks out in the elements to prove that the coated 1095 steel could handle it.

I used the mouse pad backed sandpaper method to sharpen and polish the edges of the Recon. There was some surface rust to remove but nothing that compromised the function. After just a few moments the cutting edges were fairly clean and had a fresh working edge.

In Use

Apart from the dimensions, both of these tomahawks share a lot of characteristics so I will talk about their uses together. Both ‘hawks are made from a classic hard use cutlery steel, 1095. It was easy to sharpen and held up well to all of the tasks outlined below.

First, lets state the obvious. A tomahawk must be able to chop and these ‘hawks can certainly do that. They easily limbed trees and snapped through smaller branches. They delivered all of the chopping performance that you would expect from a tomahawk.

What really surprised me was the uses for all of the other cutting edges that I found. Both tomahawks have cutting edges that run along their top edges from the bit to the spike. I found tons of uses for this. I found that it was actually easier to use this edge to create “fuzz sticks” for fire starting. It could also be used like a ulu with rocking cuts to quickly prep jute twine for tinder. The uses were limited only by my resourcefulness.

A spike can be a useful thing in the woods. The spikes on both ‘hawks could be used like an awl to bore holes but the more blade-like spike on the Jackel was easier to use for these tasks.

I found that the Jackal was much easier on the hands with its hand filling micarta handle slabs. The Recon’s handle was made more comfortable with gloves, but I would definitely want to cord wrap it if I planned to use it for a long period of time.

The Recon was a great thrower. It stuck pretty readily even though I am a lousy tomahawk thrower. I am not sure there is much of a practical reason to throw a tomahawk, but it is certainly fun and it did put the durability of the Recon to the test. The Recon shrugged off throwing with no ill effects. The Jackal’s edge geometry is thinner and it is not suitable for throwing. It is a more pure cutter.

I used both tomahawks to split wood into kindling. Both tomahawks split wood easily. The camo finish on the Jackal held up surprisingly well during this test.

One of the coolest features that you might not notice in the pictures is that the circular cutout under the bit and beard area of the tomahawk is sharpened. This was awesome for hooking and cutting cord. It was also really great for limbing. You could reach up over head, hook a branch, and then pull down sharply to easily remove branches that were out of reach. The same technique could be used closer to the ground for clearing brush, much like a bill hook machete. Just make sure to keep something like a ceramic rod on hand to sharpen this area since typical square stones won’t work.

A typical tomahawk has a straight haft. The OBW ‘hawks have a slight curve and contours that make them comfortable to use and very aggressive when chopping. The slight curve allows you to really snap the ‘hawk with your wrist for an extra little bite when you are chopping. These are shaped very well for prolonged use.

Amazing Sheaths

The sheaths that come with the Jackal and Recon are works of functional art in themselves. They are a combination of kydex, micarta, shock cord, and metal that work together to make some seriously innovative sheaths. Both sheaths have locking mechanisims that keep the tomahawk in the sheath until you are ready to produce it. The kydex work is impeccible and there are amazing details like precisely machined micarta used as spacers to allow for the thickness of the ‘hawks and aid in retention. I have never seen micarta used this way with kydex.

The Jackals sheath worked by placing the spike in first and then the bit. A small pin that was tensioned by shock cord could be slid up to release a disk that rotates in such a way that it locks the bit in place. It sounds and looks complicated but it was actually quite easy. I must have spent 10 minutes just playing with the mechanism.

The Recon’s sheath is a bit more simple. You place the bit in first and the the spike. Once the spike is in place, a pin could be slipped into a place that locked the ‘hawk in the sheath. The pin is captive and kept under tension with shock cord. It is a very elegant solution. This sheath also featured a large belt loop.

As enamored as I was with the amazing locking mechanisms and workmanship on these sheaths, I did find myself wishing they were smaller. I think that the locking mechanisms required much more material than a simple friction or click type sheath would have required. There are also many cutting edges that must be covered so that also adds to the size. Still, the sheaths were extremely functional and easy to use. you can not help but be impressed with them. They almost steal the show.

Conclusion

These tomahawks from Omnivore Blade Works are just too cool. They look and perform extremely well. The sheaths will keep you entertained for hours and they will keep your tomahawk safe, too. I am extremely impressed with the whole package. It was hard to send these tomahawks on to the next person in the “pass around.”

Check out the full line of tomahawks and knives on Omnivore Blade Work’s website.

Review: Carlson Comps Mini Comp

I’ve been able to spend a little time recently with the Mini Comp from Carlson Comps. The Mini Comp isn’t for everyone but it does a very good job of serving a couple of specific niches.

One of my favorite things about checking out Carlson Comps muzzle devices is talking with the proprietor of Carlson Comps, Greg Carlson. He is a straight shooter that won’t yank your chain. He readily admits that the Mini Comp isn’t anything earth shattering. He designed it for just a few specific purposes: it adds little to the barrel’s overall length, it is ban compliant for this in ban states, and it does provide a little compensation for muzzle rise.

I mounted the Mini Comp on a 16″ BCM BFH lightweight mid-length upper and set about testing it against a standard A2 flash suppressor. The Mini Comp is similar to the A2 flash suppressor in that it has open slot shaped ports on top and a closed bottom. It is essentially a shorter, lighter version of the A2 and it performs much like one as well, at least in terms of compensation for muzzle rise. That means that it helps a bit, but it certainly isn’t doing as much as a dedicated compensator like the Carlson Comp.

Greg likens the Mini Comp’s performance to an AK slant brake and I found that comparison to be accurate. I could feel that it is doing something versus a bare barrel but it really doesn’t do a lot to control muzzle rise. The closed bottom port did prevent the muzzle blast from scattering dust and debris on he ground when the carbine was being shot from prone and in terms of noise coming from the muzzle the Mini Comp is no more intense than an A2.

The device did seem to suppress some flash though it is not classed as a flash suppressor by the BATFE which is key to one of the niches that this device serves. The Mini Comp is classed by the BATFE as a compensator, which makes it legal for those who live in “assault weapons ban” states.

The main purpose of this device is to minimize the addition of length to the barrel. Many flash suppressors are designed to be long enough to bring the length of a 14.5″ barrel up to 16″ when the device is pinned in place. The devices don’t necessarily need to be that long to perform but they are made longer so they can fulfill a specific role. Carlson Comps went the other direction with the Mini Comp. It is shorter and lighter for the purpose of being short and light. It is designed to keep short barrels short and it does that. It is about 1/2 the length of many muzzle devices and 2/3rds the length of the A2.

If you are living in a ban state and want a device that performs similarly to an A2 flash suppressor or you have a barrel that you want to keep as short as possible, the Mini Comp may be for you. Check it out on the Carlson Comps website.

Disclaimer: The Mini Comp was provided to me for review, free of charge, by Carlson Comps.

 

Review: Battle Arms Development CASS-3P

I first wrote about the CASS-3P AR-15 selector back in June and you can read more about the excellent pedigree of this selector in that post. Since that time, I have been working with a prototype CASS-3P that Battle Arms Development provided for me to review.

The CASS-3P will feel familiar to those of you who have have a BAD-ASS already. The levers are dimensionally identical to the excellent BAD-ASS levers. However, there are 2 notable differences that really make the CASS-3P stand out.

The first difference is the way that the levers mount. The BAD-ASS uses a slot style mounting system that takes the stress off the mounting screws but does nothing to retain the lever without the screw. The CASS-3P uses a horizontal dovetail mounting system. This not only takes the rotational stresses off the screw but will retain the lever to a certain extent even if the screw is lost or broken. I tested this by installing the strong side lever without a screw and cycling the lever from fire, to safe, to fire, and so on. I made it to 200 cycles before I was bored and the lever was still intact. It was sliding around on the core but it didn’t fall off.

The second difference is that the center core that the levers attach to is slightly longer. This is to allow some additional clearance for when you slide the levers onto the core. The happy coincidence is that this also makes the levers feel wider. They are dimensionally the same as the BAD-ASS levers but they are raised slightly higher off of the receiver. This makes them even easier to find with your fingers but also can add to the interference with your trigger finger so you will want to choose your weak side lever wisely. If you are used to shooting with an ambidextrous selector switch, you really won’t even notice the extra thickness.

Overall, this is probably the most battle worthy selector from Battle Arms Development yet. The dovetail mounted levers adds a degree of redundant lever retention that is really attractive for those who are looking to build a fighting carbine. The CASS-3P will be available on the Battle Arms Development website soon.

Review: White Sound Defense H.R.E.D.

The HRED from White Sound Defense is a direct replacement for the Glock extractor depressor assembly that is designed to provide more reliable extraction. This functionality has become especially relevant as Generation 4 and later Generation 3 Glocks have been experiencing reliability issues that seem to stem from inconsistent extraction.

The HRED (bottom) is a complete redesign of the standard extractor depressor assembly.

How It’s Different

The HRED differs in several ways from the Glock OEM extractor depressor. It isn’t different just for the sake of being different. Each difference represents a purposeful redesign to enhance reliability.

The HRED comes with White Sound Defense’s heavy duty extractor spring. This heavier spring provides more tension than the stock spring. It is ground flat on the ends to ensure that they do not bind or misalign. This spring is available separately for use with the factory extractor depressor unit.

The most obvious difference between the OEM parts and the HRED is that the OEM parts insert with the short end toward the rear of the Glock and the HRED inserts with the short toward the extractor. This is done to shift the mass of the unit so that the movement of the slide assists the plunger rather than working against it.

The entire HRED unit is made from stainless steel. It has a larger diameter than the stock part so that it resists movement and binding in the extractor depressor channel.

Every material, dimension, and function was scrutinized and tweaked for reliability during the creation of the HRED.

Does it Work?

I installed the HRED in my Glock 17 Generation 3 RTF2. This particular G17 was produced sometime in early to mid 2010 as far as I can tell. It has experienced no stoppages through just over 600 rounds but it did exhibit some very inconsistent extraction. It would kick one piece of brass way over my shoulder like it should and then the next would dribble out of the ejection port and flop onto my forearms. This seemed to happen with several different types of ammo. The weak extraction seemed to happen about 1 in 5 times.

After the installation of the HRED, I have seen consistent extraction. In fact, I haven’t had a piece of brass hit my forearms since the installation. I have just over 400 rounds on the G17 since I installed the HRED without any stoppages. Stoppages seems much less likely now that the G17 is ejecting consistently.

Does it work? It has worked for me so far. For what it’s worth, several users are reporting online that the HRED alone has cured the reliability issues that they were having with their Gen4 9mm Glocks.

Installation is simple using the included diagram and easy to follow instructions.

Conclusion

Is the HRED the cure for your Glock reliability woes? It might just be. It is certainly a well designed and well executed unit that could even help improve the reliability and durability of Glocks that aren’t having issues. I am impressed with the results that I have witnessed from the HRED. As with any new part, only time and testing in your particular firearm will tell the whole story.

You can read a far more technical and detailed description of how the HRED works at White Sound Defense’s website.

Review: QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT Installed by IWC

I recently mentioned that Impact Weapons Components (IWC) is offering Magpul MOE Hand Guards with their QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT pre-installed by IWC. Now I have a sample of the hand guards in hand so that I can check out the QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT and the quality of the installation for myself.

IWC uses a jig to allow them to precisely and repeatably locate the hole that must be drilled in order to install the QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT in the MOE Hand Guards. The result is a very clean looking installation. At first glance, the modification is barely noticeable. It looks like it was meant to be there.

IWC installs the QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT very close to the receiver end of the hand guards. This serves a couple of purposes. First, placing your sling mount closer to the receiver increases the mobility of the rifle. You can move the rifle through more shooting and manipulation positions without the sling pulling so taught as to hinder movement. This location also happens to have enough “meat” to allow mounting the QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT on any of the three lengths of MOE Hand Guards.

The QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT itself is very slick. This is about as low profile and light weight as a sling mount can get. It nests inside the hand guard with only a small metal ring protruding through to give a clue that there is a sling mount present. There is a split ring on the outside that prevents the QD Micro from falling back into the hand guards and 2 small set screws inside that prevent it from spinning. I am also happy to note that there are several rotation stops that prevent the sling swivel from spinning. This is an incredibly economical, simplistic, and clever approach to mounting a sling.

You can view the MOE Hand Guard and QD Micro MOUNT-N-SLOT combos on the IWC website.

Disclosure: This product was provided to me by IWC, free of charge, for review.

Remember to use the coupon code “triggerjerk” at checkout to receive 5% off at IWC.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes